Critères d’évaluation interne—Oraux    IB—Option Moyenne
 
Niveau Critère A: Task—Message Critère B: Interaction Critère C: Language
0 Candidate has not attained any of the descriptors below Candidate has not attained any of the descriptors below Candidate has not attained any of the descriptors below
1-2 Contents are extremely superficial or incomprehensible
Task: Inadequate execution
Message: Mostly incomprehensible/generally inadequate responses
Ideas: Argument unsupported by facts or examples/Ideas repetitive and/or off the subject
Communication is barely coherent
Interaction: rarely engages in the discussion/needs constant prompting
Ease: Conversation/dialogue disjointed
Reaction: limited understanding/inappropriate
Language generally understandable
Vocab.: Limited duration/often incorrect
Accuracy: Disproportionate amount of gramatical errors
Pronunc.: Prohibits communication
3-4 Contents are superficial and barely understandable
Task: Execution barely adequate
Message: Just comprehensible/responses sometimes inadequate
Ideas: Argument is poorly supported by facts or examples/Ideas sometimes repetitive and/or off the subject 
Hesitant communication
Interaction: hesitant engagement/needs frequent prompting
Ease: Conversatino/dialogue without continuity
Reaction: Responses indicate partial understanding 
Language not always understandable and lacks flow
Vocab.: Limited duration/some incorrect or inadequate usage
Accuracy: Disproportionate amount of gramatical errors in the use of simple structures
Pronunc.: Often prohibits communication
5-6 Contents are generally adequate
Task: Execution generally adequate
Message: Generally understandable/ responses mostly adequate
Ideas: Argument supported by some simple but pertinent facts or examples/Ideas are almost always pertinent and convincing
Communication is elementary but exists
Interaction: Engages well enough in the conversation but sometimes needs prompting
Ease: Some cohesion errors in the development of the conversation
Reaction: Responses indicate global understanding
Language generally understandable
Vocab.: Elementary/generally adequate/few idiomatic expressions
Accuracy: Tries to use more complex structures but with frequent errors
Pronunc.: Limits communication from time to time
7-8 Contents are adequate and has some interesting aspects
Task: Well executed
Message: Understandable and generally clear/adequate responses
Ideas: Argument supported by pertinent facts or examples/Ideas are mostly pertinent and convicing
Communication is easy
Interaction: well-engaged in the conversation
Ease: Somewhat at ease in the development of the conversation/dialogue
Reaction: Responses indicate a certain understanding of details/nuances
Language generally flows
Vocab.: varied and generally adequate/uses some idiomatic expressions
Accuracy: variety of grammatical structures
Pronunc.: Does not hinder communication
9-10 Contents are interesting
Task: Very well-executed
Message: Understandable and clear/responses are always adequate
Ideas: Argument is supported by generallly well-chosen facts or examples/Ideas are pertinent, convincing and rather original
Communication is lively
Interaction: Actively participates in the conversation
Ease: At ease in the development of the conversation/dialogue
Reaction: Responses indicate a good appreciation of details/nuances
Language flows
Vocab.: Extensive and adequate/uses many idiomatic expressions
Accuracy: Panorama of grammatical structures with few errors
Pronunc.: Facilitates communication

Retournez à la page de la Présentation Individuelle Orale 

Retournez à la page de la Musique Francophone

Retournez à la page de Mme Delaney